I thought Roald Dahl was bad. Then I checked my daughter’s bookshelf

We’re sorry, this feature is currently unavailable. We’re working to restore it. Please try again later.

Advertisement

This was published 1 year ago

Opinion

I thought Roald Dahl was bad. Then I checked my daughter’s bookshelf

There’s much ado at present about the editing and republishing of works by literary extremist Roald Dahl. Some of Dahl’s most infamous works are being rewritten to make them acceptable to the sensitivities of the enlightened, modern world we find ourselves in.

It’s only right and good that the works of radicals like Dahl are refined to dampen the harmful impact of their archaic notions on children. For too long works like Charlie and the Chocolate Factory and James and the Giant Peach have been corrupting the minds of children the world over.

Dangerous stuff.

Dangerous stuff.Credit: Wikimedia Commons

The fracas over Dahl’s work prompted me to check the content of my nine-year-old daughter’s bookshelf, to make sure there were no similarly subversive and potentially damaging works. I was astounded at the offensive filth we had so innocently allowed our daughter to collect over the years. I wept for my failure as a parent, allowing such destructive concepts, camouflaged by notions of care-free fun, to infest my child’s world.

Here then, is a sample of some of the books I found that should be immediately banned or heavily censored to protect our children from ideas that have no place in modern society.

The Cat in the Hat, Dr Seuss: promotes an invasive domestic species responsible for devastating Australia’s natural fauna. Could be revised as Quokka in the Hat.

Loading

Goodnight Moon, Margaret Wise Brown: singling out the moon to say “goodnight” to while ignoring other planets and planetoids in the solar system promotes an anti-inclusion agenda.

Possum Magic, Mem Fox: introduces children to pagan religious practices encouraging participation in the occult and Magic: the Gathering.

Green Eggs and Ham, by serial offender Dr Seuss: protagonist attempts to force-feed meat and poultry produce to an individual who obviously identifies as vegan, until the victim finally succumbs to the torturous advances. The fact that the victim finds they actually enjoy the animal products is irrelevant. Could be revised to Green Tofu and Plant-Based Spam.

Advertisement

Harry Potter, J.K. Rowling: Hogwarts practises discriminatory school admission, limiting its staff and student intake to wizards and witches. Anyone considered a “muggle” is barred from applying to study.

The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe, C.S. Lewis: suggests children will find a “magical world” if they stay “in” the closet.

The Hobbit, J.R.R. Tolkien: insinuates that height-challenged people are more suited to perpetrating break and enter criminal activities.

Madeline, Ludwig Bemelmans: it’s French.

Winnie the Pooh, A.A. Milne: introduces explicitly adult concepts to young children – a bear with addictive tendencies who refuses to wear pants in public; a donkey suffering manic depression; a tiger obviously under the influence of amphetamines.

Loading

Thomas the Tank Engine, Rev. W Awdry: promotes and glorifies vehicles powered by fossil fuels.

Where the Wild Things Are, Maurice Sendak: the main character embarks on a “boat ride” and ends up having “fun” on an island. The book subliminally indoctrinates children as to the appropriateness of offshore visa processing.

The Twilight Series, Stephenie Meyer: Kristen Stewart. That is all.

This is merely a sample of the books my child was exposed to. Who knows how many other harmful tomes have slipped through the cracks and are still corrupting our kids? Eternal vigilance in safeguarding the minds of our children must be the responsibility of every parent.

Brad Emery is a freelance writer and aspiring children’s author.

The Opinion newsletter is a weekly wrap of views that will challenge, champion and inform your own. Sign up here.

Most Viewed in Culture

Loading